Please rotate your device to landscape mode to view the charts.

Background and Context

Time Period & Scope

This study examines who invested in British companies in the five decades following the liberalization of incorporation law in the 1850s and 1860s.

Data Collection

Analysis of 453 company-years and over 172,000 shareholders from ownership records of 293 companies created between the 1850s-1902.

Research Focus

Investigation of investment patterns among different socio-occupational groups and how these changed over time during the Victorian era.

Composition of Capital Providers Shows Dominance of Rentiers

  • Rentiers (wealthy individuals with no formal occupation) were the largest providers of capital at 44.8%
  • Businessmen provided 20.2% of capital, followed by middle classes at 11% and women at 10.9%
  • Financial professionals and institutions provided relatively small proportions at 4.3% and 1.1% respectively

Growth in Women Investors and Decline in Businessmen Over Time

  • Women's capital contribution grew from 2.9% in 1850s/60s to 19.7% by 1900s
  • Businessmen's contribution declined from 38.1% to 13.1% over the same period
  • Demonstrates significant shift in investor base over the Victorian era

Investment Preferences Across Different Industries

  • Rentiers heavily invested in mining companies (77.1% of mining capital)
  • Women preferred utilities and financial firms (12.6% and 12.8% respectively)
  • Businessmen favored breweries and financial firms (19.2% and 23.5% respectively)

Risk Preferences in Share Types

  • Women invested more in preference shares (13.0%) compared to ordinary shares (9.5%)
  • Businessmen showed opposite trend with 20.8% in ordinary vs 15.3% in preference shares
  • Reflects different risk appetites among investor groups

Geographic Investment Patterns

  • Rentiers invested heavily in London-based companies (56.5% of capital)
  • Businessmen provided more capital to regional companies (27.5% in provincial-only listed firms)
  • Shows clear geographic preferences among different investor groups

Contribution and Implications

  • First comprehensive analysis of who financed the expansion of the Victorian equity market
  • Demonstrates how different investor groups had distinct preferences that influenced the development of various asset classes
  • Findings help explain the growth of preference shares and investment trusts as vehicles catering to specific investor clienteles

Data Sources

  • Capital Providers chart based on Table 3 showing occupational composition of capital and shareholders
  • Time Changes visualization derived from Table 4 showing percentage of capital contributed by decade
  • Industry Preferences chart constructed from Table 7 showing proportion of capital by industry
  • Share Types data from Table 8 comparing ordinary vs preference share ownership
  • Geographic patterns visualization based on Table 9 showing capital contribution by location